Zimbabwe vs Sudan

In Zimbabwe, the minimum wage is $0.87/hr. In Sudan, it is ج.س.30,000/mo ($49.59 USD). Sudan has the higher rate by 5600% in USD terms. That nominal gap does not account for local prices; see the purchasing power comparison below for a cost-of-living-adjusted view. Workers in Zimbabwe may retain a larger share of their earnings if prices there are lower.

The average gross salary in Zimbabwe is $253/mo, compared to ج.س.85,000/mo ($140.50 USD) in Sudan. In USD terms, workers in Zimbabwe earn approximately 80% more. Average salaries reflect the full labor market, not just the minimum wage floor. The gap between Zimbabwe and Sudan is shaped by differences in industry composition, labor productivity, and the overall cost of living in each country. Workers in Zimbabwe earn more in nominal terms, though how far that income stretches depends on local prices in Sudan.

Zimbabwe has a longer standard work week at 45 hours, compared to 40 hours in Sudan. Workers in Zimbabwe work 45 hours per week by law. Longer mandatory hours can offset a nominally higher wage; a worker in Sudan working fewer hours may have comparable or better effective hourly earnings depending on the wage levels of each country. Total annual compensation depends on both the wage rate and the number of hours required.

While direct cost of living data varies by source, GDP per capita (PPP) gives a useful proxy for overall economic level. Zimbabwe has the higher GDP per capita at $5,928, which is 2.8x that of Sudan at $2,116. From Zimbabwe's perspective, this means goods and services are priced at a higher economic level. A higher GDP per capita generally correlates with higher wages, higher consumer prices, and greater availability of goods and services. Workers moving between these two countries should expect significant differences in rent, food, and transportation costs.