Skip to main content

Key Facts: Chile vs Papua New Guinea Wages

Chile Minimum Wage
CLP2,994/hr ($3.26 USD)
Papua New Guinea Minimum Wage
K3.50/hr ($0.93 USD)
Chile Avg. Gross Monthly Salary
CLP750,000 /mo ($816.99 USD)
Papua New Guinea Avg. Gross Monthly Salary
K2,200 /mo ($585.11 USD)
Data Sources
Dirección del Trabajo / Ministerio del Trabajo y Previsión Social; 2026 rate per Ley 21.751 (eff 2026-01-01) (2026-05-27), Department of Labour and Industrial Relations — Papua New Guinea / ILO (2026-02-25)

Chile flag Chile Papua New Guinea flag Papua New Guinea

Updated 2026-05-27

Chile flag Chile

Minimum Wage

CLP2,994 /hr

$3.26 USD

Avg. Gross Salary

CLP750,000 /mo

Papua New Guinea flag Papua New Guinea

Minimum Wage

K3.50 /hr

$0.93 USD

Avg. Gross Salary

K2,200 /mo

Min wage: +250% Chile vs Papua New Guinea Avg. salary: +40% Chile vs Papua New Guinea

The minimum wage in Chile is 250% higher than in Papua New Guinea when converted to USD. Average salaries are higher in Chile at $817/mo compared to $585/mo in Papua New Guinea. GDP per capita (PPP) in Chile is 7.4x that of Papua New Guinea, underscoring the structural economic divide.

From Chile's perspective: adjusting for purchasing power, Chile's minimum wage buys more than Papua New Guinea's. The PPP-adjusted hourly rate in Chile is $7 international dollars, compared to $1 in Papua New Guinea. Chile has higher GDP per capita ($36,181 vs $4,875). Chile's unemployment rate is 9.0% compared to Papua New Guinea's 2.6%.

Detailed Comparison

Detailed wage comparison between Chile and Papua New Guinea
Metric Chile Papua New Guinea
Minimum wage /hr CLP2,994 $3.26 K3.50 $0.93
Minimum wage /mo CLP539,000 $587.15 K606.67 $161.35
Minimum wage /yr CLP7,007,000 $7,632.90 K7,280 $1,936.17
Avg. gross salary /mo CLP750,000 /mo $816.99 K2,200 /mo $585.11
Avg. net salary /mo CLP622,500 /mo $678.10 K1,900 /mo $505.32
Median individual income /yr CLP6,000,000 /yr $6,535.95 K7,200 /yr $1,914.89

Percentage differences are based on USD equivalent values. Positive means Chile is higher.

Work Week

Chile

43 hrs/wk standard

Max 43 hrs/wk

Overtime : 1.5x pay

Ley de 40 horas (Ley 21.561) is reducing the workweek in steps: 45h → 44h (April 2024) → 43h (April 2026) → 40h (April 2028). As of April 26, 2026 the standard is 43h. Final reduction to 40h takes effect April 2028. Overtime paid at 50% premium, maximum 2 hours/day. Distributed across 5 or 6 working days.

Papua New Guinea

40 hrs/wk standard

Max 48 hrs/wk

Overtime : 1.5x pay

Papua New Guinea Employment Act sets a standard 40-hour week (8 hours/day, 5 days). Maximum is 48 hours including overtime. Overtime is paid at 1.5x the ordinary rate. Work on Sundays is at 2x. The extractive sector often operates on rotating shift schedules under enterprise agreements.

• WAGE TRAJECTORY (USD/hr)

Chile Papua New Guinea Source: wage.is · USD equivalent/hr

What This Means for Workers

A minimum wage worker moving from Papua New Guinea to Chile would see a 250% increase in USD-equivalent hourly earnings. Standard work weeks differ: Chile mandates 43 hours while Papua New Guinea mandates 40 hours. A minimum wage worker's weekly earnings in Chile are $140 vs $37 in Papua New Guinea.

See this comparison from Papua New Guinea's perspective: Papua New Guinea vs Chile

Compare Chile with...

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the minimum wage higher in Chile or Papua New Guinea?

In Chile, the minimum wage is CLP2,994/hr ($3.26 USD). In Papua New Guinea, it is K3.50/hr ($0.93 USD). Chile has the higher rate by 250% in USD terms. That nominal gap does not account for local prices; see the purchasing power comparison below for a cost-of-living-adjusted view. Workers in Papua New Guinea may retain a larger share of their earnings if prices there are lower.

How much more does the average worker earn in Chile compared to Papua New Guinea?

The average gross salary in Chile is CLP750,000/mo ($816.99 USD), compared to K2,200/mo ($585.11 USD) in Papua New Guinea. In USD terms, workers in Chile earn approximately 40% more. Average salaries reflect the full labor market, not just the minimum wage floor. The gap between Chile and Papua New Guinea is shaped by differences in industry composition, labor productivity, and the overall cost of living in each country. Workers in Chile earn more in nominal terms, though how far that income stretches depends on local prices in Papua New Guinea.

Which country has better purchasing power for minimum wage workers, Chile or Papua New Guinea?

After adjusting for local prices using purchasing power parity (PPP), minimum wage workers in Chile can afford more than those in Papua New Guinea. The PPP-adjusted rate is $7 in Chile and $1 in Papua New Guinea. PPP converts wages into equivalent US dollar buying power, accounting for what a unit of currency actually buys locally. The 367% purchasing power gap means that even if the nominal wage in Papua New Guinea appears competitive, minimum wage workers there face greater constraints on day-to-day spending.

How do work hours compare between Chile and Papua New Guinea?

Chile has a longer standard work week at 43 hours, compared to 40 hours in Papua New Guinea. Workers in Chile work 43 hours per week by law. Longer mandatory hours can offset a nominally higher wage; a worker in Papua New Guinea working fewer hours may have comparable or better effective hourly earnings depending on the wage levels of each country. Total annual compensation depends on both the wage rate and the number of hours required.

What is the cost of living difference between Chile and Papua New Guinea?

While direct cost of living data varies by source, GDP per capita (PPP) gives a useful proxy for overall economic level. Chile has the higher GDP per capita at $36,181, which is 7.4x that of Papua New Guinea at $4,875. From Chile's perspective, this means goods and services are priced at a higher economic level. A higher GDP per capita generally correlates with higher wages, higher consumer prices, and greater availability of goods and services. Workers moving between these two countries should expect significant differences in rent, food, and transportation costs.